GOA Slams Bloomberg and Justice Stevens for their Idiotic Ideas on the 2nd Amendment
Obama Budget Lays Groundwork for Universal Gun Registry
Gun Owners win key victories, including one before the Supreme Court
Time to Repeal Gun-Free Zones!
Lawless Obama Shreds More Constitutional Protections for Steel Core 5.45x39 Ammo
Will the New Jersey Governor Sign a Gun Control Bill?
GOA Slams Bloomberg and Justice Stevens for their Idiotic Ideas on the 2nd Amendment -- While gun owners dramatically winning the culture war


Read the Full Story
Obama Budget Lays Groundwork for Universal Gun Registry -- And ATF makes the import ban on 5.45x39 ammo official



Read the Full Story
Gun Owners win key victories, including one before the Supreme Court -- And gunnies say goodbye to a good friend



Read the Full Story
Time to Repeal Gun-Free Zones!



Read the Full Story
Lawless Obama Shreds More Constitutional Protections for Steel Core 5.45x39 Ammo


Read the Full Story
Will the New Jersey Governor Sign a Gun Control Bill? Take the GOA poll and send a message to Gov. Christie  

Read the Full Story
image GOA Slams Bloomberg and Justice Stevens for their Idiotic Ideas on the 2nd Amendment
image Obama Budget Lays Groundwork for Universal Gun Registry
image Gun Owners win key victories, including one before the Supreme Court
image Time to Repeal Gun-Free Zones!
image Lawless Obama Shreds More Constitutional Protections for Steel Core 5.45x39 Ammo
image Will the New Jersey Governor Sign a Gun Control Bill?

Legislative Action Center LINK

GOA News

Top Headline
Resist

An Open Letter to the People of Connecticut:
How citizens of the Constitution State must resist lawless gun control

“He may be the first person charged under [the] Conn. gun registration law,” reported The Blaze on April 16, 2014.  “But why did police take ‘several’ of his legal guns for ‘safe keeping’?” For...

Read More...
Mayor Michael

Michael Bloomberg is late to the party with his anti-gun push

Editor's note: Michael Hammond is the legislative counsel for Gun Owners of America. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author. (CNN) -- Like a 3-year-old who thinks he's just discovered the wheel, billionaire Michael Bloomberg is reveling over his startling new...

Read More...
Judge Stevens

Gun Groups Slam Stevens' 'Idiotic' Idea to Alter Second Amendment

Gun-rights advocates slammed retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens' suggestion to revise the Second Amendment to specify that Americans have the right to bear arms only when serving in militias... Erich Pratt, spokesman for the Gun Owners of America, told Newsmax that the view represented "sour grapes on his part." Pratt...

Read More...
Scott Wagner

Tea Party Write-in Candidate Defies the Establishment
-- Trounces Republican and Democrat candidates in state senate race

Earth to the Republican Party:  Ronald Reagan called and he wants his party back. Both Republicans and Democrats alike were stunned when a write-in candidate trounced the establishment picks for their respective parties in a state senate race last week. The Republican...

Read More...

Self-Defense Corner

Top Headline

Armed thugs meet armed combat veteran (Connecticut)

A National Guard Staff Sergeant found himself in a combat situation at home - in Hartford, Connecticut. The Staff Sergeant deployed twice to Afghanistan with the 102nd Infantry Regiment. Just before 2:30 Saturday morning (April 19, 2014), the Staff Sergeant encountered two cars blocking the road he was driving on. He honked and asked the...

Read More...

California Jewelry Store Owner Wins Gunfight With Armed Robber

Many times, the mere presence of a firearm is enough of a deterrent to end a violent crime. However, sometimes a defensive situation does deteriorate into an actual gunfight. This is the situation a jewelry store owner in Antioch, CA found himself in last week. Two armed men attempted to rob the Hardy Nix Jewelry store, but...

Read More...

Entire Family Opens Fire on Early Morning Home Invader

You’re going to have a bad day if you’re a home invader and you’re facing a single armed citizen. You’re probably going to have a terrible day if you’re facing an entire armed family. According to WFLA, that’s exactly what happened to one unlucky home invader in Winter Haven, FL, According to WHPD, the suspect was a complete...

Read More...

BREAKING: First Defensive Gun Use in Chicago Illinois by Carry Permit Holder!

It has begun in Chicago! The law abiding citizens of Chicago will no longer sit idly by as criminals and thugs take over their city. Here we have the first ever documented defensive gun use in Chicago by a carry permit holder! According to The Chicago Tribune, a 53 year old man legally used deadly force to defend...

Read More...

DA finds fatal shooting justified

Kyle Ford was acting in self-defense when he shot and killed Joshua Pride Salyer, the Muskogee County District Attorney’s Office has ruled. Ford, 30, told officers that he shot a man, later identified as Salyer, after Salyer and two other men came toward him in an aggressive manner. Ford said his next-door neighbor had knocked on his door, asking for...

Read More...

John McCain's Top 10 Class-Warfare Arguments Against Tax Cuts

John McCain's Top 10 Class-Warfare Arguments Against Tax Cuts
As published at Human Events

1. "I don't think the governor's tax cut is too big -- it's just misplaced. Sixty percent of the benefits from his tax cuts go to the wealthiest 10% of Americans -- and that's not the kind of tax relief that Americans need.... Gov. Bush wants to spend the entire surplus on tax cuts. I don't believe the wealthiest 10% of Americans should get 60% of the tax breaks. I think the lowest 10% should get the breaks....

"I'm not giving tax cuts for the rich."

-- Discussion with media, reported in "Bush, McCain Snip Over Tax Cut Plans," Los Angeles Times, and "GOP Rivals Bicker on Taxes," Washington Post, Jan. 5, 2000.

2. "I have never engaged in class warfare. I am very much in favor of tax cuts for middle-income and lower-income Americans. I'm deeply concerned about a kind of class warfare that's going on right now. It's unfortunate. There's a growing gap between the haves and have-nots in America, and that gap is growing, and it's unfortunately divided up along ethnic lines.

"I feel very strongly that we ought to have middle-income and lower-income tax cuts, and we'll be getting into it, I'm sure, later on in this program. Mine are basically comparable to Gov. Bush's, in some cases far better. But I'm not sure we need to give two-thirds of that tax cut, of that money, to the wealthiest 10% of America."

-- Michigan Republican Debate, Jan. 11, 2000.

3. "I always thought that class warfare was to take away from the rich. I always believed that that was what class warfare was all about. As I said, there are tax breaks and money for the richest in America and the very rich, but I think that it's clear that there's a growing gap between rich and poor in America, the haves and the have-nots. And many studies have indicated that, and I think that the people who need it most and need the relief most are working middle-income Americans and that's what I want to give to them. And at the same time, the greatest benefit that I can give them is to make sure that their Social Security benefits are there. And I also don't think it's fair for us to lay a $ 5.6 trillion debt down on future generations of Americans."

-- NBC's "Meet the Press," Jan. 16, 2000.

4. "We give the millionaire a $2,000 refund. Gov. Bush gives him $50,000."

-- Quoted in "John McCain: How Straight a Shooter?" by Jeff Jacoby, Boston Globe, Jan. 27, 2000.

5. "There's one big difference between me and the others -- I won't take every last dime of the surplus and spend it on tax cuts that mostly benefit the wealthy. I'll use the bulk of the surplus to secure Social Security far into the future to keep our promise to the greatest generation."

-- McCain campaign commercial, January 2000.

6. "I don't think Bill Gates needs a tax cut. I think you and your parents do."

-- Michigan State University rally, Feb. 20, 2000.

7. "Mr. President, the principle that guides my judgment of a tax reconciliation bill is tax relief for those who need it the most -- lower- and middle-income working families. I am in favor of a tax cut, but a responsible one that provides significant tax relief for lower- and middle-income families. And I commend Sen. Grassley for moving in that direction. But I am concerned that debt will overwhelm many American households. That is why tax relief should be targeted to middle-income Americans. The more fortunate among us have less concern about debt. It is the parents struggling to make ends meet who are most in need of tax relief.

"I had expressed hope that when the reconciliation bill was reported out of the Senate Finance Committee, the tax cuts outlined would provide more tax relief to working, middle-income Americans. However, I am disappointed that the Senate Finance Committee preferred instead to cut the top tax rate of 39.6% to 36%, thereby granting generous tax relief to the wealthiest individuals of our country at the expense of lower- and middle-income American taxpayers."

-- Senate floor statement during debate over President Bush's tax relief package, May 21, 2001.

8. "During the debate on the Senate version of the tax reconciliation bill, I had urged my colleagues that substantial tax relief to middle-income Americans should be our top priority. While I regret that my amendment to cut the top rate by one percent to 38.6% so millions more middle-class Americans would fall into the 15% tax bracket failed on a tie vote, Sen. Grassley did move in that direction in the Senate bill by insisting that the top rate should be cut to only 36%. As a result, I reluctantly voted for the bill but pledged to vote against the conference report should further reductions in the top tax rate be made at the expense of the majority of Americans who are in much greater need of tax relief.

"Unfortunately, the conference report did just that by jettisoning the commendable work both Senators Grassley and Baucus did in crafting a Senate reconciliation bill that provided more tax relief to middle-income Americans. This conference report lowers the top rate cut to 35%, at the cost of delaying, for several years, much needed tax relief for married couples unfairly penalized by our tax code....

"We had an opportunity to provide much more tax relief to millions of hard-working Americans. . . . I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle-class Americans who most need tax relief."

-- Senate floor statement before voting against President Bush's tax cut, May 26, 2001.

9. "I am concerned that repeal of the estate tax would provide massive benefits solely to the wealthiest and highest-income taxpayers in the country. A Treasury Department study found that almost no estate tax has been paid by lower- and middle-income taxpayers. But taxes have been paid on the estates of people who were in the highest 20% of the income distribution at the time of their death. It found that 91% of all estate taxes are paid by the estates of people whose annual income exceeded $190,000 around the time of their death....

"We have no idea what our financial or economic situation will be ten years from now.... We may want to have the flexibility to provide significant tax relief for lower- and middle-income taxpayers. Other unforeseen issues may arise. The point is that we must think beyond the horizon. Making the repeal of the estate tax permanent fails to take these new circumstances into account.

"We will need resources to deal with ... responsible tax reform that benefit lower- and middle-income taxpayers."

-- Senate floor statement opposing HR 8, a bill to permanently eliminate the death tax, June 11, 2002.

10. MCCAIN: "Shouldn't we give relief to average citizens who also are double taxed every single day?"

HOST KATIE COURIC: "But, Sen. McCain, if you listen to Commerce Secretary Don Evans, and he just appeared on this program, working Americans, the middle-class Americans, under the Bush proposals will get a major break. A family of four making $39,000 a year, according to Mr. Evans, will get a $1,100 tax cut for several years, allowing them to plan their individual budgets. That sounds like something that won't just simply benefit the wealthy."

MCCAIN: "Well, I think it will. But when you look at the percentage of the tax cuts that -- as the previous tax cuts -- that go to the wealthiest Americans, you will find that the bulk of it, again, goes to wealthiest Americans.... A lot of Americans now are paying a very large a -- low and middle-income Americans are paying a significantly larger amount of their income in taxes. I'd like to see them get the bulk of the relief."

-- NBC's "Today," Jan. 7, 2003.

Opinion Editorials

  • 40 Oklahoma Sheriffs Asked to Disarm – They Leave Instead
    Gun-grabbing fever has finally reached the conservative stronghold of Oklahoma. An annual meet-and-greet at the Oklahoma State Capitol in Oklahoma City turned sour when an anonymous senator demanded that the 40 sheriffs in attendance remove their firearms. But...
  • The Stand
    The ongoing Bundy Ranch controversy is a test, and we’re the ones being tested. Never before in human history have a people just voluntarily laid down their liberty and property without bloodshed. The statists know this, which is why they’ve spent...
  • Federal agency vows to continue legal action after ending Nevada ranch standoff
    The Bureau of Land Management vowed Saturday that it would continue its legal fight to remove illegal cattle from a rural Nevada range after ending a tense weeklong standoff with a rancher and his supporters. "After 20 years and multiple court orders...