• Stop Schumer Gun Control!

  • Concealed Carry Reciprocity Looking More Likely

  • Urge Your Senators to Repeal the Veterans Gun Ban

  • Senate Confirms Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court

  • Four Big Victories for the Second Amendment

  • Second Amendment Victory in the House

  • Trump Signs GOA-Backed Repeal of Social Security Gun Ban

  • John Cornyn Introduces Concealed Carry Reciprocity in the Senate

  • GOA Celebrates Another Huge Gun Rights Victory

  • Should the UN Dictate Your Right to Own a Gun?

  • GOA Generating Huge Support for Concealed Carry

  • Who Voted Against Jeff Sessions?

  • Sen. Crapo Introduces Hearing Protecting Act in U.S. Senate

  • Finally, You Will be Able to Enjoy Your Guns Without Damaging Your Ears

  • I Need Your Help in Congress

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15

GOA News

  • Trump's Court Nominations
  • Army Secretary Nominee
  • Guns and Mass Shootings
  • Trump Addresses Pro-Gunners
  • Jay Dickey Dead at 77

Gun groups rejoice at Trump’s new federal court nominations

“Gun owners certainly welcome the courts becoming more ‘gun friendly’ under a Trump presidency,” Pratt said. “Gun Owners of America has been involved in several gun cases, including the recent Peruta case — now up for consideration by the Supreme Court — which challenges state laws that effectively prohibit concealed carry.”


Read More

Army Secretary Nominee: Citizens Should Have Same Arms As Military

The West Point graduate and Iraq War Army veteran [that] President Donald Trump has nominated to be the new Army Secretary has a very good understanding of the Second Amendment, which is predictably driving anti-liberty liberals insane.


Read More

Why do people buy guns after a mass shooting?

Larry Pratt, executive director emeritus of Gun Owners of America, believes that handgun buyers might be "predisposed" to want to defend themselves, but they don't until a mass tragedy tips the scales. "When something like that happens and it's vividly covered in the media, then that may prompt them to finally take action," Pratt said.


Read More

Trump to be first president since Reagan to speak at this 2A convention

“President Trump has done more for gun rights in his first 100 days than any president in recent memory,” said Erich Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America.


Read More

Congressman who blocked gun violence research funding dead at 77

“Gun Owners of America opposes any CDC involvement in the firearms issue,” said  Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America. "The notion that firearms are a contagious disease is risible.”


Read More

The Hidden Costs Of Gun Control

By
Dr. John Lott


State legislatures across the country are debating the imposition of "childproof" locks on guns_. Unfortunately, despite the obvious feel-good appeal of these rules, they are more likely to cost lives than save them.

To understand why, consider first how many accidental gun deaths occur in the U.S. In 1995 there were 1,400 such deaths. Just 200 of those involved children under 15. In comparison, 2,900 children died in motor vehicle crashes, 950 children drowned, and more than 1,000 children died from fire and burns. Hundreds more children die in bicycle accidents every year than die from all types of firearms accidents. But which is more likely to make the "Eyewitness News"? And which is more likely to inspire legislators' attempts at a quick fix?

Of course, any child's death is tragic and it's hardly consoling that such common home fixtures as swimming pools and space heaters are potentially lethal. Yet it is true that the very rules that seek to save lives can result in more deaths. Banning swimming pools would help prevent drowning, for example; but if fewer people exercised, life spans would be shortened. Heaters may start fires, but they also keep people from getting sick, and from freezing to death. So whether we want to allow pools or space heaters depends not only on whether some people may be harmed by them, but also on whether more people are helped than hurt.

Similar trade-offs exist for gun locks. Mechanical locks that fit either into a gun's barrel or over its trigger require the gun to be unloaded, and may prevent a few children's deaths. But locked, unloaded guns offer far less protection from intruders, and so requiring locks would likely greatly increase deaths resulting from crime.

Futuristic guns like those necessitating wearing a wristband that emits a radio signal to activate the gun are far from reliable and will cost $900 when they are finally available. Under the new rules, such costs of gun ownership would fall far more heavily on law-abiding citizens than on criminals -- decreasing the numbers of innocent people who could use guns to protect themselves. So the debate over gun locks comes down to how many of the 200 accidental child deaths will be avoided vs. how such rules will reduce all people's ability to defend themselves.

Unfortunately, despite the best of intentions, safety rules do not always increase safety. President Clinton has argued many times that "we protect aspirin bottles in this country better than we protect guns from accidents by children." However, Harvard economist W. Kip Viscusi has shown that child-resistant bottle caps have resulted in "3,500 additional poisonings of children under age 5 annually from (aspirin-related drugs) ... (as) consumers have been lulled into a less-safety-conscious mode of behavior by the existence of safety caps." If Mr. Clinton were aware of such research, he surely wouldn't refer to aspirin bottles when telling us how to deal with guns.

Other research shows that guns clearly deter criminals. Polls by the Los Angeles Times, Gallup and Peter Hart Research show that there are at least 760,000, and possibly as many as 3.6 million, defensive uses of guns per year. In 98% of the cases, such polls show, people simply brandish the weapon to stop an attack.

The defensive nature of guns is further reflected in the different rates of so-called hot burglaries, in which a victim is at home when a burglar strikes. In Canada and Britain, which both have tough gun-control laws, almost half of all burglaries are "hot." In The U.S., where greater gun ownership is allowed, only 13% of burglaries are "hot."

Criminals are not behaving differently simply by accident. U.S. felons reveal in surveys that when committing crimes they are much more worried about armed victims than about the police.

In recent research into gun ownership rates across states over time, I have found that higher gun ownership rates are associated with dramatically lower crime rates. Further, it is the poorest people in the most crime-prone areas who benefit most from gun ownership. Safety rules that raise the costs of gun purchases will thus reduce gun ownership and hit these people the hardest. And the higher costs of gun ownership go well beyond the costs of buying guns with mechanical or electronic locks; they include civil and likely criminal liability if guns are involved in accidents.

So if gun lock laws are unlikely to save lives, indeed if they are likely to cost lives, then who would benefit from them? Answer: plaintiffs' lawyers. The General Accounting Office reported in 1991 that mechanical safety locks are unreliable in preventing children over six years of age from using a gun. Will manufacturers meet the proposed laws' requirements if their products carry disclaimers saying that the gun locks may not work? Without such a disclaimer, imagine the lawsuits manufacturers would face for supplying locks that they know would fail to guarantee protection. Research into similar situations involving children's vaccines suggests that such liability costs can account for 90% of the price of a product.

Laws frequently have unintended consequences. Fortunately, it's not too late to stop the new gun "safety" laws before they produce the same headaches -- and much worse -- that the aspirin-bottle rules have caused.


Dr. John Lott is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. This article originally ran in the Wall Street Journal in July 1997. It is reprinted with permission.

Self-Defense Corner

  • Robbers go to wrong house
  • Texan Stops Bar Shooting
  • Store Owner Fights Robbers
  • Steal a Car Get Shot
  • Good Samaritan Stops Robber

Attempted Robbery Suspect Shot By Woman After Picking Wrong Home

JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA — A woman was forced to shoot a man who entered her home against her will and attempted to rob her, reports Action News Jax.

Read More

Concealed Carrier Stops Potential Mass Shooting Inside Texas Sports Bar, Killing Gunman

ARLINGTON, TEXAS — An angry man stormed into Zona Caliente Sports Bar & Grill a little after 6 pm local time, armed with two fully loaded pistols and two knives. The man, identified as James Jones, killed one employee before meeting his opposition; an armed citizen.

Read More

Store owner’s fight against robbers caught on camera (VIDEO)

Surveillance video from a California jewelry shop last week shows an armed store owner chase away three men in an attempted smash-and-grab right in front of him.

Read More

Man shot while attempting to steal a car

TUCSON (KGUN9-TV) - A man was shot while attempting to steal a car on Saturday.

Read More

Good samaritan pulls gun on would-be robber

A good samaritan took action when they witnessed an attempted robbery near the FedEx Forum Thursday.

Read More

GOA Media Clips

        

     





facebook_icontwitter_iconyoutube_icon

The Lie Behind Gun Free Zones | Video

Limited Time Offer

1 oz., .999 pure silver coin.

2A Update