• Are You Registered?

  • Republican Leaders Capitulate to Obama; Trump Stumbles in Debate

  • Constitutional Carry Continues Advancing, and Other Great News for Gun Owners!

  • Obama moves to Transfer Effective Control of the Internet to the United Nations

  • Keep Up the Pressure for Concealed Carry Reciprocity

  • Your Help Needed to Repeal “Mobile” Gun-Free Zones

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

GOA News

  • Clinton’s Five Point Plan
  • Obama’s Parting Shots
  • GOA's Legal Defense Team Goes to Bat
  • Gun-Show Customers’ License Plates
  • Trump Agrees with Clinton

Tim Macy: Hillary Clinton’s Five Point Plan to Destroy the Second Amendment

"If Hillary wins, you can all but kiss the Court's recognition of that individual right goodbye. But Hillary Clinton’s attack on the Second Amendment involves more than just stacking the courts with anti-gunners." - Tim Macy, Chairman of Gun Owners of America

Read More

Obama’s Parting Shots

"Obama administration moves to put gunsmiths out of business,” GOA said in a headline. “Gun owners understand that, notwithstanding the Obama administration’s dishonest protests to the contrary, the clear intention of this regulation is to effectively make gunsmithing illegal.”

Read More

GOA's Legal Defense Team Goes to Bat for Constitutional Rights of Gun Owners

"GOA's legal team has submitted an amicus brief in this Supreme Court case, Manuel v. Joliet, on the basis that protecting the Fourth Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans will ultimately protect the rights of gun owners to be free from "unreasonable searches and seizures."

Read More

Gun-Show Customers’ License Plates Come Under Scrutiny

"Erich Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said his group also opposes such surveillance. “Information on law-abiding gun owners ends up getting recorded, stored, and registered, which is a violation of the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act and of the Second Amendment,” Mr. Pratt said."

Read More

Donald Trump Agrees with Clinton that People on Watch Lists Should Potentially be Barred from Buying Guns

“The problem with secret government watch lists is that they are full of non-criminals,” [GOA's Erich] Pratt said. “No one should lose their rights, including those protected by the Second Amendment, without being convicted in a court of law.”

Read More

Gun Grabbers Have No Proof Washington DC's Gun Ban Laws Have Worked

Larry Pratt

Washington DC's unconstitutional gun ban laws have been in effect for more than 25 years.

But, I am not aware of any credible study which shows these law have worked -- by which I mean that they have reduced crimes by individuals using guns. And the gun-grabbers and their allies are unable to cite any such study.

One of the earliest backers of the DC gun ban laws was Charles Orasin.

In late 1978, when the District of Columbia's Court of Appeals upheld the District's gun ban laws, Orasin, at the time a spokesman for the National Council To Control Handguns, said: "This is a victory for all the residents of the District."

When called at his Virginia home recently and asked if he knew of any studies which shows that the DC gun ban laws have actually reduced crimes committed by people with guns, Orasin said: "I am not interested in discussing this subject."

He hangs up the phone.

Of course, that he would chose to live in the safety of Virginia which bristles with guns is perhaps all the discussion that is needed.

In his idiotically titled book Every Handgun Is Aimed At You: The Case For Banning Handguns (New Press, 2001), Josh Sugarmann, Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center (VPC), says (page 85):

"We know in the District of Columbia -- where we've banned handguns -- that if you minimize the number of handguns you are going to have less shootings, a pretty simple, straightforward concept."

Oh, really? And what data is there that shows there have been "less shootings" in Washington DC since private citizens were denied their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms?

Well, Matthew Nosanchuk, Litigation Director for the VPC, says, in an interview, he thinks that in the mid-1980s there was a University of Maryland study which showed the DC gun ban had "a positive effect."

What, exactly, Nosanchuk is alluding to is not clear because he had no specific date and no specific name for the study which he mentions.

In 1991 there was a study published in the New England Journal Of Medicine by four authors one of whom was at the time at the University of Maryland.

The study, titled "Effects of Restrictive Licensing of Handguns on Homicide and Suicide in the District of Columbia," purported to show the 1976 DC gun ban law decreased murders.

But, this study has been exposed as a methodological mess and a fraud. In a review of this study, Dr. Edgar A. Suter, chairman of Doctors For Integrity In Research And Public Policy, notes the following:

* The study's claimed apparent, temporary and miniscule homicide drop occurred two years before the DC gun ban law took effect.
* The study used raw numbers rather than population-corrected rates exaggerating the authors' misinterpretations.
* The study conveniently stopped as Washington DC's overall homicide rate skyrocketed to eight times the national average and the black, male, teen homicide rate skyrocketed to 22 times the national average.

Gene Healy, an attorney and senior editor at the CATO Institute, says the murder rate in Washington DC is 55 percent higher than before the DC gun ban laws went into effect.

Healy has joined three other attorneys -- Alan Gura, Robert A. Levy and Clark M. Neily -- to file what is arguably the finest, most concise and compellingly documented defense of the "individual right" view of the Second Amendment I have ever seen.

They represent six plaintiffs who have gone to U.S. District Court in our Nation's capital to challenge Washington DC's anti-gun laws which blatantly infringe the Constitutionally protected right of private citizens to keep and bear arms.

I repeat: This brief is without a doubt one of the best I have ever read on this subject.

You can read it and other documents pertaining to this case online here.

I urge you to read it closely, print it out and keep it as a reference document. It is excellent and the attorneys who put it together are to be congratulated.

But back to the question, is there any evidence that the DC gun ban has actually reduced crimes committed by people with guns. Perhaps the Feds know of such a study which points to the answer.

However, when this question is put to an official U.S. Justice Department spokesman, she says, after checking, "on background," asking not to be named: "I do not know of any study."

How about the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department? Certainly the MPD has some data showing the DC gun ban laws have worked. I mean, they enforce these laws, right? Wrong. No data. Here's the way the conversation went when Quinton Pearson, a Public Information Officer was interviewed:

Q: What data do you have that shows the DC gun ban laws have reduced crimes committed by people using guns?
A: What data do we actually have?
Q: Yeah. The laws have been in effect now for more than 25 years.
A: Hmmmm. I don't know that we do have any data that shows it's reduced crime. I don't think any study has ever been done.

Finally, you'd think that if anybody would have any information showing that the DC gun ban laws have worked, it would be Washington's Mayor Anthony Williams who has been one of the strongest supporters of these unconstitutional laws.

But, when asked if the Mayor had any evidence, or knew of any evidence, that the DC gun ban laws have reduced crimes committed by people with guns, his press spokesman Tony Bullock said: "No, I don't have any such information, no."

He refers the question to Peter Lavallee, Communications Director for the Office of the Corporation Counsel.

When interviewed, Lavallee says: "I don't know of any such data off-hand that I've seen." He says he'll call back after checking with his Criminal Division. He calls back.

Lavallee: "I checked with the four top people in our Criminal Division and they said this didn't ring a bell with them" (that is the question regarding whether there is any data showing that the DC gun ban laws have worked).

Q: Interesting, isn't it?, that your gun ban laws have been in effect more than 25 years and you have no evidence these laws have worked.
Lavallee: I see the point you're making.

But, wait! I have, after a diligent search, found a specific mention of a specific study assessing the impact of the DC gun ban law.

This study is alluded to in a book by one of the pioneer, Founding Fathers of the gun-grabber movement, Pete Shields.

In his 1981 book Guns Don't Die -- People Do (Arbor House), on page 79, Shields, at the time chairman of Handgun Control, Inc., notes, proudly, that Washington DC, in 1977, passed one of the strictest handgun control laws in the nation.

The result? Well, Shields says that Edward D. Jones III, a former Justice Department analyst, made a study comparing handgun homicides in 1974 with handgun homicides in 1978, the first full year of the DC gun ban law.

And? And, among other things, "the study also showed that the new law had little impact on the use of handguns in street crime."

Why? Because, according to Jones, the criminal can follow his "single-minded intention to engage in criminality" by the simple expedient of buying a handgun elsewhere.

In other words, once again, we see the truth of the statement widely ridiculed by the gun-grabbers: "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." Exactly.

Is Virginia the Cause of DC's Problems?

Washington, D.C. has, perhaps, the most restrictive gun control laws in the country, and yet it has one of the highest murder rates in the nation.

Critics claim criminals merely get their guns in Virginia where the laws are more relaxed. This, they argue, is why the D.C. gun ban is not working.

Perhaps criminals do get their guns in Virginia, but this overlooks one point: If the availability of guns in Virginia is the root of D.C.'s problems, why does Virginia not have the same murder and crime rate as the District? Virginia is awash in guns and yet the murder rate is much, much lower. This holds true even for Virginia's urban areas, as seen by the following comparison on the 25-year anniversary of the DC gun ban (in 2001):

CityMurder rates: 25 years after DC's ban
Washington, DC 46.4 per 100,0001
Arlington, VA 2.1 per 100,0002
(Arlington is just across the river from D.C.)
Total VA metropolitan area 6.1 per 100,0003

Guns are not the problem. On the contrary, lax criminal penalties and laws that disarm the law-abiding are responsible for giving criminals a safer working environment

1FBI, "Crime in the United States," Uniform Crime Reports (October 28, 2002): 77.
2Id. At 190. According to Arlington County's Department of Planning, Housing and Development, the population in Arlington, Virginia for 2001 was 190,1092.
3Id. at 85.

Self-Defense Corner

  • Armed Robber Becomes Target
  • Bank Robbery Foiled
  • Homeowner Shoots Burglar
  • Vet Shoots Intruder
  • Pastor Saved By Wife

Armed Robber Goes To Walmart, Becomes Target

An armed robber went up to a Walmart employee sitting in his car before his shift started, pulled a weapon, and told the employee to, “give him everything.”

Read More

Concealed Carrier Defends Himself And Others Against Bank Robber

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA — A concealed carrier was waiting patiently to deposit a check at a local branch of Wells Fargo when a bank robber rudely cut in front of him. The bank robber allegedly told all the customers to get in the corner and wait while he turned his attention to the bank teller. After complying with the bank robber’s initial request, the concealed carrier drew his pistol and fired a shot — missing the bank robber and hitting the couch behind him.

Read More

Texas Homeowner Shoots Burglar — Burglar Confesses To Crime While Being Treated For Gunshot

DALLAS, TEXAS — James Nero, 30, broke into a Dallas man’s home in broad daylight and was shot by the homeowner. He fled the scene but later was forced to surrender to police in order to seek treatment for his gunshot wound. He confessed to attempting to burglarize the man’s home and was charged by Dallas police.

Read More

71-Year-Old Disabled Vet Shoots Home Invasion Suspect

A 71-year-old disabled veteran protected himself, shooting and wounding a home invasion suspect who refused to stand still when ordered to freeze.

Read More

Pastor’s Wife Shoots Would-Be Robber Who Beat Her Husband with Rifle

On September 15 a pastor’s wife in Philadelphia opened fire on an alleged assailant as her husband yelled, “Shoot him, Shoot him.”

Read More

GOA Media Clips




The Lie Behind Gun Free Zones | Video

Limited Time Offer

1 oz., .999 pure silver coin.

Gun News